You mean that structural features like prohibition of criticism in brainstorming leads to limited and unimaginative ideas, which is the point of brainstorming in the first place, and that no one agrees on what the the structural features of brainstorming actually are in the first place?
In any case, I don't understand your writing very well because it doesn't show a lot of clarity, but if you really wanna keep up a debate, I don't mind.
