No, "the court ruled 8 to 1 that such an intrusive search without the threat of ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

joshfraser on Aug 21, 2014 | parent | context | favorite | on: Security Analysis of a Full-Body Scanner

No, "the court ruled 8 to 1 that such an intrusive search without the threat of a clear danger to other students violated the Constitution's protections against unreasonable search or seizure".

How would her having illegal drugs be a clear danger to other students?

wdewind on Aug 21, 2014 [–]

No what? Nothing I said disagrees with that.

Can we go back to the part where you explain how scanners at airports are a "blatant violation of our Constitutional rights"?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact