Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm torn on how I feel about security being a paid feature in this case. Here the onus is being placed on the user, yet many won't be conscious of the choice they're making.

The tiff mentioned in the article was interesting to read. > https://twitter.com/mveytsman/status/491298846673473536



There's two problems with this that I see. The first is, as you said, that a lot of people won't even realize they need to pay for secure downloads.

I also feel like in the case of something like a package manager, this potentially harms the wider community in ways that charging for features in a specific piece of software doesn't.


Technically paying for an auth token is not sufficient. The token cannot be used directly by Maven or Leiningen, but only by a Nexus proxying repository manager. Not a big deal if you work at a professional Clojure shop, but a huge hassle if you're freelance or just getting started.


It is like having a population partially vaccinated, almost pointless on a large scale.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: