Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

He-said-she-said, bleh. And these things come to light after a breakup between the two of them. Seriously, who would trust what either of them say? It'll get settled in court no doubt, but let's not jump on the bandwagon here.

Edit: http://www.buzzfeed.com/sapna/tinder-sued-for-sexual-harassm... - If this is real the guy is a real piece of shit. -This- is the type of guy who should be removed from his company. If the guy in Github was forced to leave this is probably a sure-thing.



In the other article, there was a link to the actual court filing with exhibits. The cofounder was definitely harassing her, unless the text messages were faked or grossly out of context.

You could say that she egged him on and was not exactly the pinnacle of maturity, but harassment is illegal and egging someone on is not.


The texts: http://www.buzzfeed.com/sapna/tinder-sued-for-sexual-harassm...

Edit: changing my opinion on this one. Originally I thought, reading those texts, it was a case of relationship drama at work, from what seemed to be the end of an existing consensual relationship. Relationships at work are dumb, but not illegal.

However, texting "you'll regret acting this way" to a subordinate is pretty damning.


"Harassment is illegal and egging someone on is not."

Isn't that the root issue ?


The root issue is wanting revenge on someone for breaking up with you.


> unless the text messages were faked

It's not that far-fetched to believe that. The texts are just screen captures of iMessage, not phone company records.


It's not impossible, but it would be really really stupid to forge messages that could conceivably be reconstructed in your motion to the court.

It's not that no one has ever done something really really stupid but it's not unreasonable to assume, for now, that the messages are not forged.


> It's not impossible, but it would be really really stupid to forge messages that could conceivably be reconstructed in your motion to the court.

True, but apparently even with a court order you can only get text message records from so far back. Two years would definitely be stretching it.

The reason I'm skeptical here is because the complaint is very much focused on her being recognized (now) as a cofounder, and the sexual harassment stuff is a convenient bludgeon.


> He-said-she-said, bleh

Documented by text messages in the complaint


Then that's good, no more hearsay nonsense. Let's hope justice is served. The complaint wasn't linked in the original article.


TIL it's a bad idea to date your direct report or your boss.


If this really is a TIL then it needs more reporting. Every professional should be aware of this guideline, and why it's important.

EDIT on re-reading this was pretty obvious sarcasm that I missed.


Frankly that was somewhat tongue-in-cheek. I'm poking fun at the way we all obsess over details, like who did or said what when or where they did or said it. There isn't a safe or appropriate way for a manager and a direct report to date. I'm sure it works out sometimes, but that's like the time I went unicycling next to a steep cliff while juggling chainsaws. I'm alive, so I must have done something right, but the activity still can't be recommended.


unicycling next to a steep cliff while juggling chainsaws

Why do I get the feeling I'm going to see that in an XKCD strip sometime soon?


Hahaha, I know right. You think this is common sense...yet here we are.


"The heart has reasons that Reason doesn't know"


Thank you! Exactly what I'm saying, this kind of thing happens and people are surprised by it?


> He-said-she-said, bleh.

It sounds like there is documentary evidence, so I'm wondering why you would characterize it like that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: