Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Thanks. I don't think that article glorified anything though.


Well, when 95% of the article supports one idea and only the last 10 lines mention the potential issues with it, I call that very biased at the least.


The article says they can't afford proper food and have no social life...


That's because they can't find jobs or they chose not to work. Either way, who's to blame for this? Surely not the hard working wealthy. Oh wait....


It's more like they choose not work, most of the time, and live off society.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: