Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

We also made NVFP4 ones if that helps! https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-NVFP4


This is the version we'll be testing on our rtx 6000 today! Thank you


Why not just run FP8 on vLLM with that much vRAM? It's plenty fast.


For high concurrency, using the blackwell's native native W4A4 MLP compute path, nvfp4 is something like a 1.2-1.5x performance increase over FP8. We're doing data enrichment (so, tasks completed successfully + tokens/second) so the performance bump shows up in the tasks/month number.

I am just now getting the benchmarks running against 3.8 27b but I expect similar results from benching 3.6 27b at the same quant.


I see. Did you see any intelligence degradation between FP8 and NVFP4 for 3.6 27B? You're using vLLM, right?


I didn't have time to run this as well, but we're getting a 99% agent completion rate across all tasks and 98% task decision that matches the human selected option(s) on Qwen 3.8 27B @ NVFP4. There may be a difference between FP8 and NVFP4 but it's inconsequential for our data enrichment purposes.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: