The right to privacy is not, and has never been, absolute. Hence, for instance, the careful wording of the text you quote: It does not say "no interference" but rather "no arbitrary interference".
There are attempts at infringing on privacy, yes, but we also see attempts at making privacy absolute, and I think the Tor Project is part of that trend.
The realistic and reasonable approach is a trade-off, as has always been the case. Usually this takes the form of strong legal protections of privacy but with exceptions controlled by the courts (e.g. warrants for searches and interception of communications) and parliaments.
There are attempts at infringing on privacy, yes, but we also see attempts at making privacy absolute, and I think the Tor Project is part of that trend.
The realistic and reasonable approach is a trade-off, as has always been the case. Usually this takes the form of strong legal protections of privacy but with exceptions controlled by the courts (e.g. warrants for searches and interception of communications) and parliaments.