Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The article references made up history like “GPT-1 by DeepMind” or “Global Data Net.” It is clearly confabulated and contains multiple non-sensical contradictions to the astute observer. I’m not surprised if it was output by GPT-3. A more lengthy response to your reaction is here: https://www.google.com/amp/s/srconstantin.wordpress.com/2019...


I'm not saying it was factually correct or internally consistent, just that it's miles ahead of any computer-generated text I've seen elsewhere.


It's certainly miles ahead of where I thought we were at. Today's GPT-3 discussion (in this thread and elsewhere) have really opened up my concept of what is possible today.

And I'm starting to wonder how many news articles are just basically GPT-3. Or really, how many people are earning good money doing less work than GTP-3 could do in an instant.


This is why everyone is talking about GPT-3


Really? I thought it was in the same class as this one:

https://amp.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/hmu5lm/fict...

As well as multiple examples given by gwern.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: