Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Military hierarchy has been pretty similar for a very long time because it works conceptually. Section/Squad/Platoon/Company/Battalion/etc.

10 direct reports don’t work from a management sense unless some folks are expected to operate very independently or if the reports themselves are second level managers, or the manager is only nominally “managing” a time card or whatever.

Management to me means you are accountable for output. I can’t be aware enough of what 10 different people/teams are doing to be meaningfully accountable for a longer period of time. It’s not fair to me and certainly not fair to the people not getting the support they need.

In my professional life, I’m responsible for a team of ~200, with 5 direct reports. It’s a mix of engineering and product/service teams. We aim for teams of 4-5 with two functions each. The secret is to be as honest as you can, have high standards, and be flexible.



Can you elaborate on what you mean by the last sentence? Sounds interesting




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: