Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It is highly unlikely though,

This isn't as hard to understand as people try to make it. By the end of ten years, I'd said pretty much everything I had come there to say. It's always better to leave the party early. If I had rolled along with the strip's popularity and repeated myself for another five, ten, or twenty years, the people now "grieving" for Calvin and Hobbes would be wishing me dead and cursing newspapers for running tedious, ancient strips like mine instead of acquiring fresher, livelier talent. And I'd be agreeing with them. I think some of the reason Calvin and Hobbes still finds an audience today is because I chose not to run the wheels off it. I've never regretted stopping when I did.

That’s from his last interview here https://www.cleveland.com/living/2010/02/bill_watterson_crea...

Edit: not sure if you saw this https://twitter.com/stevesilberman/status/530095596279848960... He made this recently



This is exactly what happened to The Simpsons. Had they stopped at season 8, I would be cherishing those memories. Now they just feel sort of sad.


I agree with that. The kids grow up. Continuing it is like someone who refuses to become an adult and remains an adolescent into what should be their productive adult years.


Bloom County, Dilbert (shudder), Doonesbury (though the characters at least aged and moved through life)... All pretty much wore out whatever made them special in their prime.


Didn’t bloom county come back for a reprise for a bit with a different name and then went lights out a second time?


Outland and Opus. Neither of which were great. He also came back on Facebook for a time to poke fun at Donald Trump. Who could resist? But that wasn't really great either.


I still like Dilbert.


Eh. There's the odd fun strip or sequence now and then. But it's mostly stuck in the 90s Pac Bell cubicle world where Scott Adams worked. There's so much fresh SV material to mine that Dilbert really doesn't. (And that's leaving aside Scott Adams' personal persona.)


You really nailed what I hadn't been able to verbalize. Dilbert is still stuck in a world that no longer exists. The open hostility, hierarchy, etc. of the corporate world has been replaced with this kind of generic feel-goodyness that still has the same sociopathic corporate behaviors but cloaked in some kind of faux "meaning"... the HBO show really nails some of this while Dilbert feels antiquated.


Also, much as I'd like to, I can't get past Scott Adams 'personal persona'. It ruined Dilbert for me. Perhaps it shouldn't, but it did.


It’s hard for me to appreciate Scott’s daily dose of misanthropy. By the time I get to the comics page, I’ve already been dosed with the pure, uncut stuff on the front page, spoken by our American President.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: