Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Thanks for the link, facts aside you gotta love the author's writing style:

> Rubin was the prototypical Goldman banker. He was probably born in a $4,000 suit, he had a face that seemed permanently frozen just short of an apology for being so much smarter than you, and he exuded a Spock-like, emotion-neutral exterior; the only human feeling you could imagine him experiencing was a nightmare about being forced to fly coach. It became almost a national clichè that whatever Rubin thought was best for the economy — a phenomenon that reached its apex in 1999, when Rubin appeared on the cover of Time with his Treasury deputy, Larry Summers, and Fed chief Alan Greenspan under the headline The Committee To Save The World. [...]

The basic scam in the Internet Age is pretty easy even for the financially illiterate to grasp. Companies that weren't much more than potfueled ideas scrawled on napkins by uptoolate bongsmokers were taken public via IPOs, hyped in the media and sold to the public for mega-millions. It was as if banks like Goldman were wrapping ribbons around watermelons, tossing them out 50-story windows and opening the phones for bids. In this game you were a winner only if you took your money out before the melon hit the pavement.



I hate Taibbi’s style. He is a descriptive writer, but after the 3rd or 4th argument you have about one of his articles you realize that it lacks the single most important thing: it’s not revealing. Two different people can read the same Taibbi article and disagree on what he meant.

At the end of the day description without clarity is a bad thing.


And now they get to do it again, brought to you by the financial-media institutional axis - now supporting Crypto™!


And it's trusty sidekick The Blockchain (TM)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: