I think a lot of people consider uniqueness of prime factorization to be obvious just because it's stated as true so frequently.
If you want to convince someone it's not obvious, I would ask them a simpler, weaker question:
Can you find four different prime numbers, a b c d, so that ab = cd? If not, why not? You may not cite unique-prime-factorization.
They will find themselves really wanting to cite unique prime factorization, and unable to prove it otherwise, which will convince people that it's not obvious.
If you want to convince someone it's not obvious, I would ask them a simpler, weaker question:
Can you find four different prime numbers, a b c d, so that ab = cd? If not, why not? You may not cite unique-prime-factorization.
They will find themselves really wanting to cite unique prime factorization, and unable to prove it otherwise, which will convince people that it's not obvious.