You're incorrect and you're incorrectly equating pot to alcohol as if the effects were remotely similar, they are not.
> And after adjusting for age, gender, race and alcohol use, drivers who tested positive for marijuana were no more likely to crash than who had not used any drugs or alcohol prior to driving.
That means users who are too high to drive know it, and don't. It also means you can drive high as long as you're not too high without adversely affecting safety.
Pot is not alcohol, it does not belong in that mold and there's absolutely no reason to single it out of the multitude of other things that can impair driving. Alcohol is a special case precisely because it impairs your judgement.
> And after adjusting for age, gender, race and alcohol use, drivers who tested positive for marijuana were no more likely to crash than who had not used any drugs or alcohol prior to driving.
That means users who are too high to drive know it, and don't. It also means you can drive high as long as you're not too high without adversely affecting safety.
Pot is not alcohol, it does not belong in that mold and there's absolutely no reason to single it out of the multitude of other things that can impair driving. Alcohol is a special case precisely because it impairs your judgement.