Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | utternerd's commentslogin

Down detector is a self-reported platform, they use a baseline over 6 months from user reports to try to automatically "detect" if there is a real outage, or if its just a couple end-users. Ultimately, the outage is entirely based on users going to down detector and clicking on "Report a Problem".

https://downdetector.com.py/en/methodology/


Huh. I thought they used to also do sentiment analysis of social media (Twitter, at least). I see that they definitely don't today, but has that always been the case?

this would be the real travesty


It explicitly said in the article that he pulled out a gun. He shouldn't have been swatted, obviously. That said, if you pull out a gun when police are responding to what they believe is an active shooter, the chances of you being shot are extremely high.

Additionally consider what would have happened if this had been an active shooting and they simply disregarded the phone call.


> It explicitly said in the article that he pulled out a gun.

A gun that he legally owned and had every right to have on his person as an unknown individual was breaking into his home. If police don't identify themselves they should expect an armed population to meet them with guns in hand. It's their responsibility to assess the situation, understand who the occupants are, and respond appropriately. Smashing a bedroom window with a shovel and then "indiscriminately" firing into it is not a reasonable response.


Good to see HN has changed their tune on gun ownership and defense. Until we see bodycam footage we're all basing our opinions entirely on what his lawyer is saying. Video will come out with a FOIA, but everyone will have moved on.


There are arguments to be made about regulations and the problems we face because of the number of guns in this country, but as long as we have a right to own them the possession of one can't be used as an excuse to execute someone


It also says that he heard glass breaking, thought they were criminals, grabbed a gun and hid behind a door.

If you’re going to mention the gun fact, why not provide the whole context?


I assumed everyone also read the article if they're commenting on it, but I fail to see what additional that context that adds; I can't imagine he was pulling it out because it was time to oil it. Police were responding to an active shooter call, and this guy pulled out a gun.


The implication of your original post is that he behaved negligently, when clearly the additional context shows that he did not. You're writing in bad faith.


The article suggests that he wasn't aware it was the police that broke into his house, and indeed having called the police and told them he was at risk of swatting it was logical to assume it would not be the police. I am unclear why police decided to coverly break in via a bathroom window rather than the more usual procedure of shining lights into the front windows and telling people to come out of the house.


> I assumed everyone also read the article if they're commenting on it, ...

You must be new to The Internet. :-)

> I fail to see what additional that context that adds

You may not have intended it sound like that, but your comment felt like classic victim blaming, which is all too common in the cases of police incompetence.


Details matter, and details like "he pulled out a gun" are not inconsequential.


> he pulled out a gun" are not inconsequential.

Yes, you already mentioned that?


When you have violent intruders breaking into your house through the window, it's reasonable that "these must be police officers, here to arrest me over a misunderstanding, and I should calmly cooperate with them so I won't be hurt" might not be the first thought which comes to mind.


I suspect he pulled it out because he heard someone breaking into his house.


From TFA:

> Melendez did grab a "legal, registered" gun once he heard the glass shatter, Sethi said, but he ducked behind a partially closed door.

> He believed someone connected to the hackers was breaking in, Sethi added.


No. You are beyond wrong. Personal firearm ownership is a constitutionally protected right, just as protection from unreasonable search (as this was). Arming oneself when someone breaks into your house is beyond reasonable. Police should expect residents to be armed and shouldn't be breaking into residences.

And please, stop blaming the victim.


It is factually accurate that he pulled out a weapon when police were responding to an active shooter call.


Nobody is calling your facts wrong. They are criticizing your post. You wrote as if criticizing the victim for their decision to pull a gun. If you did not mean to do that, you should simply state that. If you did mean to do that, then you are ignoring what people are saying in favor of pretending they are denying the simple facts of your post. You are being evasive in both cases - whichever it is.


Why are there so many guns in this God-forsaken country? Why did local cops respond to an active shooting call? Why did they enter the house, instead of waiting for a specially trained team? Why did the victim have a gun?


>Why are there so many guns in this God-forsaken country?

Surplus arms after World War 2 led to the creation of the gun industry in the US, and thanks to the Second Amendment and the power of the gun lobby, its relationship with the Republican Party, and decades of popular media making them cool, that's a guaranteed untouchable industry.

> Why did they enter the house, instead of waiting for a specially trained team?

What "specially trained team?" That was the specially trained team. They're specially trained to break down doors and shoot people.

Americans get the policing they vote for, and they consistently vote for tacticool cowboys with Punisher tattoos and against... anything less than more of that.

There is probably a relationship between this and the first question.

>Why did the victim have a gun?

Self defense, presumably, as is his Constitutional right.


> What "specially trained team?" That was the specially trained team.

Weren’t they some local cops? In my country there is a handful of police teams specialised in hostage situations and the like. In case of an "active shooting", local cops would typically establish a perimeter until these guys come and handle the situation (without deaths if possible, although they are sharp shooters).


OK I assumed it was a SWAT team, I didn't read the article closely enough, my fault. I'll take the hit for that.

But if it had been... the result still would have been the same. American police aren't trained to de-escalate, SWAT less so.


Which also, is literally not a crime. Don't blame the victim.


> Which also, is literally not a crime

I believe that the person you are responding to is arguing wisdom, not legality.


And yet our state is still the fourth-largest economy in the world.


Morocco GDP is comparatively choo choo


"Organic means better" is the embarrassing and misleading talking point here though, not being against having toxic chemicals in our food sold as "organic". I don't want added copper compounds and residue in my food, and copper sulfate used in organic farming empirically does that.

"The most frequently quantified [organic] pesticide was copper." https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/5570...


Your own reference says:

> Analysis of these articles revealed no significant difference in ..., zinc, and copper.

> restrictions limit the use of copper salts.

I see a theoretical risk but not a practical problem here. At best you've identified a place where the regulations might need tightening.


This doesn't say that conventional cultures are better on that front.


This is untrue. For example, Copper Sulfate is a moderately toxic substance used in organic farming and is highly corrosive. It is approximately 5 to 10 times more toxic than Glyphosate (LD50 of ~300 to 790 mg/kg for Copper Sulfate vs. >4,320 mg/kg for Glyphosate.)

https://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/archive/cuso4tech.html https://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/archive/glyphotech.html


These two substances are used at entirely different times, for entirely different purposes, in entirely different manners, with different levels of persistence in both the environment and the final product.


Indeed. Copper sulfate is persistent (it's copper!) and is often used not long before harvest.

Meanwhile, glyphosate is used early before planting to kill off the weeds and so it's naturally degraded (to harmless CO2 and water) by the harvest time.


You're conflating two different categories of product and their targets.

Copper is a fungicide, which is a category of product that both chemical ("conventional") and organic farmers often need to use for certain types of crops in certain types of climates, including pretty much any fruit. There are chemical fungicides which are more targeted and thus can be "greener" in some ways than copper, but there's also a lot more which are substantially worse.

Whereas RoundUp/glyphosate is an herbicide, which is a category of product that chemical farmers use extensively but organic farmers use rarely to not at all, relying instead on cultural and mechanical means. And what organic herbicides are used rely on contact rather than systemic action.

Funnily enough, both are pretty terrible when used near bodies of water. But chemical agriculture requires a much greater volume begetting much greater runoff.


Sadly that is no longer the case. Glyphosate is sprayed to kill crops for harvest now. It's called pre-harvest desiccation.


LD50 is a very poor measurement for this kind of stuff though, there are plenty of stuff that can severely harm you on the long term at relatively low doses but will never realistically kill you in the short term no matter how high the dose (asbestos fibers for instance). Many carcinogenic or reprotoxic stuff are like that.


300mg/kg is still 6 times higher than for Paraquat. So you only confirmed what was said above.


Unified Memory or VRAM, not just RAM.


Ironic, I just had a phishing attempt yesterday from a phone number that showed up on my Pixel as from "Google".


I've been running an N100 for 3 years with a 5 bay external enclosure over USB 3.2 Gen 2 and ZFS, and have not had any issues. It is pretty phenomenal, pulls about the same power, and costs around the same as an RPi 5 but provides substantially more compute and throughput.


They were a fairly common occurrence in the late 90s. I worked at an OEM at the time and we would stockpile it during gluts for that reason, then make a killing ~6-9 months later.


What should we be doing now if we want to profit?


Ez, buy low sell high and don't buy high and sell low


Buy what, exactly? GPUs? Are they "low" right now?


My guess is that motherboards, cases and PSUs will be low soon.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: