When someone writes a piece of software and uses "#include ...", or "import ...", etc, do you come to them and tell them they didn't write the solution on their own?
Let's ignore that fact that you're saying "this isn't just a VR device" and then immediately describe the basic functionality of a VR device.
You really think people have been waiting to drop $1k for a device that lets them play games designed for a monitor inside of a headset rendering a larger virtual monitor with all of the additional complexity that brings?
For those priced out of getting an AVP at more than 3x the price on locked down hardware? You don't seem to think that market exists, but I think it does. $3,500 and Apple, or whatev but Facebook are total non-starters for some people while Valve and Linux are.
Don't waste your time arguing with people like this. They can't admit the nuance of the situation: what Aaron did was blatantly wrong, and what the government did in response was disproportionate. They will only focus on the latter, and make endless irrational justifications for the former.
This reminds me so deeply of the "old" internet that I can't help but want to get into penny pressing machines just for the sake of wanting to find this website useful to me. Just someone with a passion, cataloging it and sharing it with everyone else with no other ulterior motives.
Why do you think it always only takes 5 years to develop some superior technology? 5 years seems like a short enough time frame that a company would rather just wait out the patent than invest heavily in R&D in the off chance they come up with a viable alternative (that now of course THEY can only protect for 5 years)
Go to the continent with more water so they can live in a place with more water (as they can't bring the water back - it's too big and too heavy).
The people in continent Y are likely to use extreme violence to stop this from happening, like we see today in the Mediterranean sea where thousands of people are murdered every year.
This game, like just about every game, has zero consequences for failure. This is like saying "Humans were involved in fatal accidents 50% of the time when playing my custom F1 racing simulator". There were no stakes and there was an artificial time constraint. Deriving any sort of takeaway from this data is entirely useless.
Getting behind the wheel of an F1 car on a track involves lots of proving time that you can actually handle such a vehicle. Meanwhile anyone with a credit card can grant an AI system to impersonate their access as a starting point.
There are places/services where you can drive a (few years old, and slightly detuned, but not THAT much) F1 car with little more than a (rather high limit) credit card.
Actually, your example there would be absolutely true. Getting in someone's enthusiast but mid-range F1 simulator toy with all the game assists turned off would both: imply a near fatal accident happening over 50% of the time AND it would be accurate too.
Consider:
FIA President Mohammed Ben Sulayem, a former Rally driver at the top level, crashed an F1 car within 100m of trying to go fast in it
And
Mr Beast, a youtuber with zero motorsports experience, crashed a Formula E car on a demonstration lap as part of the pre race F1 festivities.
If a regular person with a drivers license and no familiarity attempted to play even a simulator video game, the results are in fact similar to what happens in the real world.
reply