I don't believe OpenAI does

My mistake, in fact it was google not OpenAI, makes sense OpenAI doesn't.

> The runtime hosted Claude Code for months and I never saw the slightest issue.

but did others?

Very odd position to take.

> This is not embarassment.

If not then it's second hand. Neither of the OpenAI or Anthropic announcements recently say much about their security and governance posture.

Same rulebook whereby they shot themselves in the foot and got their model clipped by the government?

And then everyone wanted to pay for the model that was so smart it was banned?

Wanted but couldn't.

.. for a few days but now they can 8I

> This is the government trying to swing its dick around and kill Anthropic because they wouldn't allow mass domestic surveillance with their models.

Amodei has been calling for models to be regulated, so he got his wish.

> I guess what I'm saying is that I won't look at his numbers since he's an unreliable source from my point of view and there's a chance that he's going to try to deceive me and it's a waste of time for me to listen to him.

But he's linking out to sources

They are willing to tolerate it now, which is quite a switch up from the free for all we had a few weeks ago, and if they aren’t able to tie in this new ~$1500p/m cap to demonstrable productivity and revenue increases then that will be kneecapped even faster

There are plenty of expenses in this order of magnitude that are not tied to direct increases in productivity. I think it may become a serious hiring impediment for companies to be really skimpy on these budgets for example.

There was a time when some employees wanted 1000$ per month for rent, imagine that.

It's absolutely insane, 1500 * 12 is north of 17K dollars, I know that in Google outside of few specific cities and roles.

Getting a 17k bump in salary is good enough to switch, if I was being 17k extra I am more than willing to use my local qwen and hand code most if not all stuff.

Companies can pay for code review tools to make life easier but writing code with AI if it's 10-15% pay cut is just too much.

Everyone is happy right now because this money hasn't been a line item in your salary/benefits.

Imagine 10k yearly AI allowance, I will probably just ask to keep that money.

All the work I do if I was judicious I could do just as much with a 20$ spend or on a local model.

Few tasks need Mythos like models, and if your task does you are already doing too much with AI

I mean we saw this with cloud spending and especially with logging and database read write cost across numerous companies.

It’s a clear pattern in service delivery for software for a while now. Hell for many goods and services in general, like Uber rides themselves.

Start cheap, get some vendor lock in, service provider reduces discounts, consumer notices and then reacts to the price by reducing consumption.

Concern maybe elsewhere, but I like how we have gone full circle.

SpaceX expects to complete its $60 billion acquisition of AI coding startup Cursor roughly 30 days after it begins trading publicly, according to Bloomberg.

Cursor's Composer 2 model was built on Kimi K2.5, who were in turn accused of 'distillation' attacks by Anthropic.

Anthropic now relies on SpaceX for compute demands.

> It paints Costco as some sort of cultural retirement home.

which is fitting since the author used the phase "cheugy" unironically.